Category: Automatism Defence
-
In R v Falconer (1990) 171 CLR 30, the High Court determined that evidence for a sane automatism defence was improperly excluded at trial, allowing Falconer’s appeal for the wilful murder conviction of her husband.
In R v Falconer (1990) 171 CLR 30, the High Court determined that evidence for a sane automatism defence was improperly excluded at trial, allowing Falconer’s appeal for the wilful murder conviction of her husband.
